The Karnataka Standoff: A New Chapter in University Governance

In a significant development that could escalate tensions between Karnataka Governor Thaawar Chand Gehlot and the Siddaramiah-led state government, the Karnataka Cabinet has approved an amendment to the Karnataka State Universities Act. This change limits the Governor’s power to appoint the vice-chancellor of the Karnataka State Rural Development and Panchayat Raj University in Gadag, marking a bold step in the ongoing political tug-of-war.

A Shift in Power Dynamics

The decision, made during a recent Cabinet meeting in Kalaburgi, signals a move toward granting the Siddaramiah government greater authority over the appointment of vice-chancellors in state-run universities. By effectively diminishing the role of the Governor, who serves as Chancellor of these institutions, the government aims to reshape the governance landscape in Karnataka.

While the government argues that the Governor has minimal influence over university operations, sources indicate that the current draft Bill only applies to one university. However, the Higher Education Department is reportedly drafting similar legislation to extend these provisions to all public universities across the state.

Context of Ongoing Conflict

This development comes amid a broader conflict between the state government and the Governor. Gehlot recently granted permission to prosecute Siddaramiah in connection with the alleged Mysore Urban Development Authority (MUDA) land allotment scam, a decision the Chief Minister is currently challenging in the Karnataka High Court.

Proposed Changes to Appointment Procedures

Under the existing framework, the appointment of vice-chancellors involves a state government-appointed search-cum-selection committee that shortlists three candidates for the Governor’s approval. The proposed amendment would simplify this process, allowing the government to select a single candidate to be submitted for the Governor’s approval.

Justifying the Amendment

The Karnataka government defends this amendment as a necessary step toward standardizing the provisions for establishing, administering, and recruiting faculty at universities. Citing a 2015 University Grants Commission (UGC) notification, the government emphasizes the importance of maintaining minimum qualifications for vice-chancellors, which include at least 10 years of experience as a professor. Furthermore, the Supreme Court has ruled that any appointment violating UGC regulations is contrary to statutory provisions, reinforcing the need for this legislative change.

Political Reactions

The BJP has been quick to criticize this move. State president B.Y. Vijayendra accused the Congress party of “undermining a Constitutional mandate,” “stifling democracy,” and seeking Governors who “operate on its directives.” He asserted that the Governor of Karnataka has maintained the dignity of his office, lamenting that the government has consistently disrespected the position while attempting to reduce its powers.

A Broader Trend

The contentious nature of vice-chancellor appointments is not unique to Karnataka. In 2022, Tamil Nadu amended its Universities Act to empower the state government with the final say in these appointments, reflecting a growing trend of political influence in university governance across India.

As the situation unfolds, it will be crucial to watch how these changes impact the governance of higher education in Karnataka and whether they signal a broader shift in the relationship between state governments and constitutional authorities. The implications for academic independence and governance standards in the state’s universities are profound and warrant careful scrutiny.