Bihar Chief Minister Samrat Choudhary speaks about the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls.
The Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar continues to remain a major political issue, with Chief Minister Samrat Choudhary defending the Election Commission’s position and opposition parties continuing to raise questions about voter deletions and the electoral-roll revision process. The issue has become part of a wider political debate over the Election Commission of India (ECI) and the procedures used to verify voter information.
Speaking in Patna on September 27, Samrat Choudhary said the SIR exercise was conducted according to prescribed rules and in a transparent manner. He argued that the revision process was intended to identify entries involving deceased voters, people who had permanently shifted from their registered addresses and voters whose names appeared at more than one location.
According to figures cited by the Bihar Chief Minister, the exercise identified 22.34 lakh deceased voters, around 36.28 lakh voters who had shifted or could not be traced at their registered addresses, and approximately seven lakh voters whose names appeared at more than one location. Choudhary said these categories accounted for deletions during the revision and maintained that allegations of illegal deletion had not been established.
The Election Commission’s final electoral roll for Bihar, published on September 30, 2025, contained nearly 7.42 crore electors. The Commission said the SIR exercise involved verification of the electoral roll and provided opportunities for eligible voters to submit claims and objections during the process.
Opposition parties have continued to question the scale and implementation of the SIR exercise, particularly regarding the possibility of eligible voters being left out of the electoral rolls. Leaders from opposition parties have sought explanations about voter deletions and have criticised the Election Commission’s handling of the revision.
The concerns have become part of a larger political confrontation involving the Congress, RJD and other opposition parties on one side and the BJP-led political establishment and supporters of the Election Commission’s process on the other. Opposition leaders have argued that electoral-roll revisions must ensure that genuine voters are not excluded, while the government and supporters of the process have stressed the need to maintain accurate voter lists.
These positions remain politically contested claims. The allegation that eligible voters were illegally removed has not been established as a general finding by the Election Commission. Choudhary has specifically rejected the opposition’s allegations and said political parties should present evidence where they believe discrepancies exist.
Chief Minister Samrat Choudhary has strongly defended the Election Commission, saying that the poll panel has already clarified questions surrounding the SIR process. He also said that political parties have the right to protest and raise concerns, but argued that allegations should be supported by facts and evidence.
Choudhary said that provisions existed for voters to raise claims and objections if they believed their names had been wrongly excluded. He also pointed to the possibility of approaching the Election Commission and the courts where genuine electoral grievances remain unresolved.
The controversy is significant because electoral rolls are fundamental to the voting process. Any large-scale revision can affect millions of voters, making accurate verification, transparency and accessible mechanisms for correcting mistakes important issues.
The Election Commission has described electoral rolls as dynamic documents that are periodically updated. Such revisions can involve additions for newly eligible voters as well as corrections or deletions relating to deaths, migration, duplicate registrations and other changes in voter status.
The Bihar controversy also forms part of a broader national political debate over SIR, with opposition parties in other states raising concerns about electoral-roll revisions and the Election Commission’s role. BJP leaders and chief ministers, meanwhile, have defended the poll panel and rejected allegations questioning its impartiality.
The political debate over Bihar’s electoral rolls and the SIR process is likely to continue as opposition parties seek further clarification and the Election Commission responds to questions surrounding voter verification and deletions.
For voters, the key issue is whether their names and details are correctly reflected in the electoral roll. The election authorities provide mechanisms for voters to verify their registration and raise claims or objections where applicable.
The Bihar SIR controversy therefore remains focused on three major issues: accuracy of electoral rolls, protection of eligible voters and transparency in the revision process. While the government and Election Commission maintain that the exercise was carried out according to established procedures, opposition parties continue to seek greater explanations regarding voter deletions and the safeguards available to affected electors.
As the political debate develops, further statements from the Election Commission, Bihar government and opposition parties will be important in determining how the controversy evolves.
The Jammu and Kashmir Legislative Assembly passed a resolution on September 28, 2026, seeking the…
The Biju Janata Dal (BJD) staged a major protest in Bhubaneswar on September 28 against…
The Karnataka Congress is set to begin an 84-day statewide foot march on September 30,…
Political debate in Uttar Pradesh has intensified over the Election Commission of India (ECI) and…
The Maharashtra government has declared drought conditions in 265 of the state’s 358 talukas, covering…
The Tamil Nadu government led by Chief Minister C. Joseph Vijay has revoked an order…