On Monday, the Supreme Court requested responses from the Delhi government and BJP leader Rajiv Babbar. This follows a plea from Delhi Chief Minister Atishi and AAP leader Arvind Kejriwal, who are challenging a high court ruling that refused to dismiss a defamation case against them.
Moreover, a bench of Justices Hrishikesh Roy and SVN Bhatti issued a notice and stayed the trial court proceedings. This decision highlights the ongoing tensions between political factions in Delhi.
Key Arguments
Senior advocate Abhishek Singhvi represents Atishi and Kejriwal. He argued that Babbar initiated the defamation case as an authorized representative of BJP Delhi. Singhvi emphasized, “Neither the central nor the Delhi BJP has filed any complaint. Babbar is not the individual I am accused of defaming.”
Conversely, senior advocate Sonia Mathur, representing Babbar, contended that the BJP leader filed the case on behalf of the party. This underscores the party’s collective stance in the matter.
High Court Context
In addition, Atishi and Kejriwal are contesting a September 2 order from the Delhi High Court. The court upheld the defamation proceedings, noting that their remarks about alleged voter name deletions could harm the BJP‘s reputation. The high court deemed these allegations potentially defamatory, suggesting they were intended to vilify the party for political gain.
Consequently, the court dismissed pleas from Atishi, Kejriwal, and two other AAP leaders—Sushil Kumar Gupta and Manoj Kumar—who sought to challenge the ongoing proceedings.
Looking Ahead
As the case progresses, it highlights the complexities of political discourse and legal accountability in India. Therefore, the Supreme Court‘s upcoming decisions will be critical. They will not only affect the parties involved but also have broader implications for political speech and defamation laws.
Be First to Comment